<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Redefining federalismBeat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redefiningfederalism.org/tag/beat/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redefiningfederalism.org</link>
	<description>About Federalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:52:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Federal Sentencing : A Good Departure IS Hard TO Beat</title>
		<link>http://www.redefiningfederalism.org/federal-sentencing-a-good-departure-is-hard-to-beat</link>
		<comments>http://www.redefiningfederalism.org/federal-sentencing-a-good-departure-is-hard-to-beat#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Departure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redefiningfederalism.org/federal-sentencing-a-good-departure-is-hard-to-beat</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The central purpose for the enactment of the United States Sentencing Guidelines was to obtain uniformity in sentencing on a national level. While the Guidelines were intended to eliminate Judge&#8217;s personalities and personal proclivities as well as eliminate disparities in regions or districts, the simple fact of the matter is that there are some districts in which downward departures are the rule and other districts where downward departures are either the exception or just never done. Even within districts, the guidelines have done nothing to address the disparity among different <a href='http://www.redefiningfederalism.org/federal-sentencing-a-good-departure-is-hard-to-beat' rel="nofollow">Read more</a></p>Here is no comments yet by the time  your rss reader get this, Do you want to be the first commentor? Hurry up ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The central purpose for the enactment of the United States Sentencing Guidelines was to obtain uniformity in sentencing on a national level. While the Guidelines were intended to eliminate Judge&#8217;s personalities and personal proclivities as well as eliminate disparities in regions or districts, the simple fact of the matter is that there are some districts in which downward departures are the rule and other districts where downward departures are either the exception or just never done. Even within districts, the guidelines have done nothing to address the disparity among different <a href='http://www.redefiningfederalism.org/federal-sentencing-a-good-departure-is-hard-to-beat' rel="nofollow">Read more</a></p>Here is no comments yet by the time  your rss reader get this, Do you want to be the first commentor? Hurry up ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redefiningfederalism.org/federal-sentencing-a-good-departure-is-hard-to-beat/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
